<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single sign-on with Linux clients and Active Directory LDAP, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/2009/12/25/single-sign-on-with-linux-clients-and-active-directory-ldap-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/2009/12/25/single-sign-on-with-linux-clients-and-active-directory-ldap-part-1/</link>
	<description>When 3-nines uptime is just way too much.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 23:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evan</title>
		<link>http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/2009/12/25/single-sign-on-with-linux-clients-and-active-directory-ldap-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/?p=271#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Thanks a lot, Jim!  I had seen some of that stuff when I was looking into this, but haven&#039;t had time to try it out yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot, Jim!  I had seen some of that stuff when I was looking into this, but haven&#8217;t had time to try it out yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Willeke</title>
		<link>http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/2009/12/25/single-sign-on-with-linux-clients-and-active-directory-ldap-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Willeke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evanhoffman.com/evan/?p=271#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Microsoft provides a neat trick to work with bitmasks.

They have defined a matchingrules. We documented this at: 
http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Query%20using%20a%20bitwise%20filter

So putting this to use, you can determine the disabled users with an LDAP filter:
http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Queries%20AD%20Integration%20Specific#section-LDAP+Queries+AD+Integration+Specific-AllUsersWhoseAccountIsDisabled

Now, figure put how to determine if the password it expired is a bit more involved.
-jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft provides a neat trick to work with bitmasks.</p>
<p>They have defined a matchingrules. We documented this at:<br />
<a href="http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Query%20using%20a%20bitwise%20filter" rel="nofollow">http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Query%20using%20a%20bitwise%20filter</a></p>
<p>So putting this to use, you can determine the disabled users with an LDAP filter:<br />
<a href="http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Queries%20AD%20Integration%20Specific#section-LDAP+Queries+AD+Integration+Specific-AllUsersWhoseAccountIsDisabled" rel="nofollow">http://ldapwiki.willeke.com/wiki/LDAP%20Queries%20AD%20Integration%20Specific#section-LDAP+Queries+AD+Integration+Specific-AllUsersWhoseAccountIsDisabled</a></p>
<p>Now, figure put how to determine if the password it expired is a bit more involved.<br />
-jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
